It was sometime in January 2008, and I was teaching at Emerson College in Boston. A couple of my Journalism students asked if they could "follow" me on Facebook, but I had to admit to them I wasn't on social media yet. In fact, I had no plans to be on it at any time soon (I think the late, great Betty White once called it a "giant time-waster," and that's how it certainly seemed to me).
But my students reminded me that as a radio consultant (which I still was at the time), I needed to be available to my clients, some of whom were certainly on social media by then. And so it was, in February 2008, that I finally joined Facebook. A few months after that, in August 2008, I joined Twitter. As time passed, it turned out to be a good way to keep in touch with people-- not just clients, but friends, former and current colleagues, and... Rush fans. Lots of them reached out, and I was happy to hear from them.
To my surprise, a growing number of folks (including my Emerson students) wanted to follow me on Facebook and Twitter-- I eventually added Instagram, but I don't use it very much. Anyway, for some reason, I've ended up with close to 5,000 followers on Facebook; and as I'm writing this, I've got more than 8,800 followers on Twitter. (I don't have, and never received, the famous Blue Check Mark-- Twitter verification turned me down twice, saying I wasn't well-known enough, there were no hashtags about me, etc. It was disappointing but somehow I survived).
I was concerned when I heard Elon Musk was buying Twitter-- I had nothing against him, and even during my years in radio, I never met the guy. But he kept referring to himself as a "free speech absolutist," and I was worried that he might allow certain voices back on the platform (Neo-Nazis, for example) who had, in my view, been justifiably banned by the previous owner. I also had noticed that while he claimed to believe in free speech, he seemed quite willing to block anyone who was critical of him or disagreed with his views. (He seemed to have shifted from generally libertarian views to more hard-right perspectives.) I can respect whatever his views might be, but I was worried about whether he would impose them on the rest of us.
Today, many of the folks I used to follow, journalists especially, have been made to feel so unwelcome that they left the platform. I miss them-- Twitter used to be a wonderful way to reach out to reporters with story ideas, or share information. Elon declared war on sites like NPR, for reasons that make no sense to me. He also has posted some bizarre conspiracy theories. He removed the Blue Check Marks from folks who had earned theirs under the previous ownership (even the Pope lost his); and he tried to monetize what used to be a way to verify whether people were who they said they were, rather than imposters or bots. And yes, he did let some folks back onto Twitter who I wish were still not permitted.
But I haven't left, and I have no plan to leave at any time soon. Twitter is still a wonderful way to organize donations for teachers via Donors Choose. It's still a wonderful way to reach out to Rush fans. When I blog about Rush, which I sometimes do, or participate in a webcast about the band, I get the most response from folks on Twitter. Meanwhile, I play Wordle with my followers, I comment on current events, and sometimes I post about what's going on in my life. I've made some good friends on Twitter; those relationships matters to me. So, as crazy as things may get, and even though I don't like what Elon has done to Twitter, I intend to stick around and keep posting. To those who read my Tweets, thank you. I look forward to continuing to communicate with you, now and in the future!
I think things will eventually calm.down with Twitter once the the losses from Twitter stops
ReplyDeleteKeep going Donna all things Rush
ReplyDeleteI have not come here to say that you staying on Twitter is wrong. Your reasoning is good and is pretty much the same as everybody else I miss from Twitter that decided to not at least start posting on an alternative platform if not completely abandon Twitter. However, just as a balance, I want to give a reason for leaving that doesn't seem to be frequently mentioned.
ReplyDeleteBy being on Twitter, one allows all of its cookies -- twitter.com, twimg.com, and t.co -- onto one's device. Each time those cookies are used/accessed, it is counted as positive support for Twitter even if all one tweets is "Elon is a poopy face!" It means you are there paying attention and engaging. Then, depending on one's browser/device settings, other sites including Blogger (owned by Google) see those cookies and it reinforces the statistics that people are still using and engaging with Twitter so it might just be OK to give what Elon is doing a pass.
Once Elon went after journalists (plus I was attacked for the first time in 15 years of using that service), I could no longer wait around and hope things got better. It sucks that his actions broke up the Twitter family for all sorts of reasons from getting more stuff from you to pretty much obliterating that platform's usefulness in spreading timely, accurate severe weather information.
Of course, it is always a tough decision between staying to fight inside or from the outside. While Google also isn't the best corporate citizen, at least those of us that decided to leave can still visit with you here.